Scotland 0–3 Brazil
Brazil backed up their xG edge (4.33–1.04 xG), winning 0–3.
Quick answers
- ResultWho won Scotland vs Brazil?
- Brazil won 3–0. The xG was Scotland 1.04, Brazil 4.33.
- Better xGWho had the better xG in Scotland vs Brazil?
- Brazil had the better xG profile, creating the better chances 4.33–1.04 and winning 3–0.
- Fair resultWas Scotland 0–3 Brazil fair by xG?
- Yes. Brazil won both the scoreboard and the xG battle.
- Biggest xG takeawayWhat was the biggest xG takeaway?
- Brazil turned a clear xG edge (4.33–1.04) into the full three points, finishing with 2.73 xPts (Δ +0.27).
- Ranking contextWas Scotland 0–3 Brazil a published FIFA ranking upset?
- No. Scotland entered 34th of 48 in the World Cup field; Brazil entered 6th of 48. The higher-ranked side got the result and had the stronger xG profile, 4.33–1.04.
| Score | 0–3 |
|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | Scotland 1.04 · Brazil 4.33 |
| Expected points (xPts) | Scotland 0.19 · Brazil 2.73 |
| Stage | Group C |
| Published FIFA rank | Scotland FIFA #42 (34th of 48) · Brazil FIFA #6 (6th of 48) |
Who had the better xG in Scotland vs Brazil?
Brazil created the better chances — 4.33–1.04 xG, an edge of 3.29. And Brazil duly won 3–0, the result matching the run of chances. In expected points, Scotland earned 0.19 and Brazil 2.73 from this game; the actual return was 0 and 3 (Δ -0.19 for Scotland, +0.27 for Brazil).
Was Scotland lucky or unlucky?
Scotland were wasteful in front of goal — just 0 from 1.04 xG, and well protected at the back, conceding 3 from 4.33 xGA faced. A fair return for the performance (Δ -0.19).
Was Brazil lucky or unlucky?
Brazil were wasteful in front of goal — just 3 from 4.33 xG, and well protected at the back, conceding 0 from 1.04 xGA faced. A fair return for the performance (Δ +0.27).
What Scotland 0–3 Brazil means for Group C
Scotland sit 3rd in Group C on 3 points (2.44 xPts, Δ +0.56); Brazil sit 1st on 7 points (6.50 xPts, Δ +0.50). See the full Group C table →
24 June xG recap · Scotland · Brazil · xG robberies · stat leaders · ← All results